Early in the '80s, using the just constructed
surface force
apparatus, Pashley and Israelachvili began accumulating accurate data
on electrical double layer repulsion between charged mica surfaces in
different electrolyte solutions. Many aspects of the data were readily
explained with the DLVO theory, other required accurate solutions of
the primitive model for the double layer [1]. However, at higher
electrolyte concentrations surface force apparatus data showed strong,
oscillatory short-range repulsion that was interpreted as an effect of
the hydration structure surrounding the ions [2]. It was called the
"hydration force" and it did not correspond to any theory. The failure
of the theory could easily be traced to the neglect of the molecular
nature of solvent.
In order to understand the anomalies in double layer
interaction
at small surface separations ("the hydration force") we need to
explicitly consider the effect of the solvent [3]. An exact theory at
the Born-Oppenheimer level was formulated [4] by constructing
electrical double layers in two separate steps that later lead to
convenient and accurate approximations: (i) a reference system
consisting of solvent between the surfaces, and (ii) ions interacting
with other ions and with surfaces via the potentials of mean force
evaluated in the reference system. The mapping is achieved by extending
the McMillan-Mayer transformation to the nonuniform fluid between the
surfaces. The results indicate approximate additivity of short- and
long-range effects in ion density and pressure, as observed earlier in
numerical work. After two approximation steps, we arrive at a practical
and accurate method for calculating properties of planar aqueous double
layers. Numerical results provide new understanding of the Stern layer
and the hydration force.
|
|
|
Examples from Refs. [5] and [6]:
Compared to the Poisson-Boltzmann equation,
calculations that
include the oscillatory short-range part of the effective potential
between the ions indicate higher counterion density near a surface
and hence a more effective screening of the surface charge.
Counterions near a surface preferably assume separations
corresponding to the minima of the mutual potential. This denser
layer of favourably packed hydrated counterions (called the Stern
layer or the Manning condensed layer in colloid science and
polyelectrolyte work respectively) extends some 6-7 Å away from
the surface and causes the apparent reduction of the surface charge
or surface potential. If surface separations are decreased to about
14 Å, denser surface layers come into contact resulting in
stronger repulsion that resembles a distinct new force. The present
accuracy in force calculation needs improvement, but it appears that
at short separations the pressure returns to the level expected
without hydration, rather than showing additional hydration
repulsion.
-> to ANU
Applied Maths Dept
-> to the first page
8/3/2005